About The Audit Survey

Who Among Our Politicians Will Call For 100% Forensic Audit?

Audit The Vote Iowa (ATVIA) has put together a 2 part survey for each of Iowa’s politician that has a role in whether or not Iowa will conduct a 100% forensic audit. Unfortunately, I haven’t found a polling plugin for WordPress that allows the participant to select a numerical value so we can tally results in a more convenient fashion. If anyone has a recommendation, please let us know right away via the “Contact” page.

The goal of this 9-question non-partisan survey is to collect and tally from participants the following data points. Bear in mind, for some of us, we did not vote for a particular politician, so this survey attempts to cover the bases.

NOTE: Please keep in mind, all of the pages are in Beta, suggested changes will be made on the fly without removing the pages.  So your comments will remain intact as well as the “receipts” you provide.  So please feel free to give it a test run and answer the polls; the polls and results themselves will necessarily change if we have to rebuild them, but everything else should remain intact.  Your participation will help us fine tune the site.

Section A -Gauging our sentiment

A1) What is your overall sentiment of the <<subject politician>>? Choices; “Proud and strong supporter (love)”; “Did not vote for, but satisfied (comfy)”, “Not best, but better than others on ballot (meh)”, “Had no choice but to vote for (mad)” and “Didn’t vote for & can’t wait to replace (irked)”

A2) Re: 03 Nov 2020 Election (not Audit), did you email/text/call or otherwise talk to him/her about it? Choices: “Yes, BUT no reply(s)”, “Yes; AND I AM satisfied with his/her direct reply(s) to my concern(s)”, “Yes, AND I AM satisfied with his/her indirect newsletter response”, “Yes; AND I AM NOT satisfied with his/her direct reply(s) to my concern(s)”, “Yes, AND I AM satisfied with his/her indirect newsletter response”, “No” and “No, but I will”.

A3) Re: Forensic Audit, did you email/text/call or otherwise talk to him/her about supporting a 100% audit? Choices: “Yes, BUT no reply(s)”, “Yes; AND I AM satisfied with his/her direct reply(s) to my concern(s)”, “Yes, AND I AM satisfied with his/her indirect newsletter response”, “Yes; AND I AM NOT satisfied with his/her direct reply(s) to my concern(s)”, “Yes, AND I AM satisfied with his/her indirect newsletter response”, “No” and “No, but I will”.

Section B: Gauging their position on the election fraud committed on 03 Nov 2021…

B1) How many times have YOU called/emailed/snailmailed/texted HIM/HER about the 03 Nov 2020 election–IN TOTAL–with or without receipts? To quantify how many times we’ve contacted (including phone calls/in person) or otherwise discussed the matter with the politician (Him/Her) in question.

B2) How many times has HE/SHE answered/replied to YOU, directly/indirectly, about the 03 Nov 2020 election–IN TOTAL–with or without receipts? To quantify how many times we’ve contacted (including phone calls/in person) or otherwise discussed the matter with the politician (Him/Her) in question. We can then see how responsive He/She are to us in proportion to the number of contacts made with them about it.

B3) Please upload copies/receipts of YOUR email/snailmail/text with HIM/HER about the 03 Nov 2020 election and indicate HOW MANY RECEIPTS you’ve posted here below. A tally of “Receipts” to quantify how many times we’ve contacted the politician in writing. If He/She are being vague or obtuse about being asked to give their opinion on the matter, we can point to the receipts”. By reading our posted receipts, it gives the reader content and style to write from when making their contact.

B4) Please upload copies/receipts of HIS/HER replies back to YOU about the 03 Nov 2020 election and indicate HOW MANY RECEIPTS you’ve posted here below. A tally of “Receipts” to quantify how many times He/She has responded to us in writing, in proportion to how many times we’ve written to them. We can use the tally of receipts to gauge how responsive they are to our concerns. By reading their posted receipts, it also gives the reader context to write specifically about when writing their next message to said politician.

Section C: Gauging their position on calling for a full forensic audit for all of Iowa…

C1) How many times have YOU called/emailed/snailmailed/texted HIM/HER about supporting a 100% Forensic Audit–IN TOTAL–with or without receipts? To quantify how many times we’ve contacted (including phone calls/in person) or otherwise discussed the matter with the politician (Him/Her) in question.

C2) How many times has HE/SHE answered/replied to YOU, directly/indirectly, supporting a 100% Forensic Audit–IN TOTAL–with or without receipts? To quantify how many times we’ve contacted (including phone calls/in person) or otherwise discussed the matter with the politician (Him/Her) in question. We can then see how responsive He/She are to us in proportion to the number of contacts made with them about it.

C3) Please upload copies/receipts of YOUR email/snailmail/text with HIM/HER about supporting a 100% Forensic Audit and indicate HOW MANY RECEIPTS you’ve posted here below. A tally of “Receipts” to quantify how many times we’ve contacted the politician in writing. If He/She are being vague or obtuse about being asked to give their opinion on the matter, we can point to the receipts”. By reading our posted receipts, it gives the reader content and style to write from when making their contact.

C4) Please upload copies/receipts of HIS/HER replies back to YOU about supporting a 100% Forensic Audit and indicate HOW MANY RECEIPTS you’ve posted here below. A tally of “Receipts” to quantify how many times He/She has responded to us in writing, in proportion to how many times we’ve written to them. We can use the tally of receipts to gauge how responsive they are to our concerns. By reading their posted receipts, it also gives the reader context to write specifically about when writing their next message to said politician.


Click on the following links below to be taken to the Audit Surveys for the applicable politicians:

Sen Chuck Grassley (R)

Sen Joni Ernst (R)

CD-01 US Rep Ashley Henson (R)

CD-02 US Rep Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R)

CD-03 US Rep Cindy Axne (D)

CD-04 US Rep Randy Feenstra (R)

Individual Surveys for each of the Iowa State Legislature, Governor, Secretary of State and Attorney General can be found here

 

Audit The Vote, Iowa! Spread the word
0 0 votes
Article Rating

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
%d bloggers like this: